Currently Empty: $0.00
|
Criteria |
Outstanding (90-100%) |
Satisfactory (70-89%) |
Needs Improvement (<70%) |
|
Tech Pack & BOM Precision |
Flawless flat sketches, completely detailed BOM with all trims/labels, complete POM spec table with tolerances. |
Minor details missing in BOM (e.g., thread type omitted), but sketches and POM specs are clear. |
Incomplete tech pack; missing POMs or BOM details; uses artistic illustrations instead of technical flats. |
|
Sourcing Strategy & Compliance |
Well-justified model selection (CMT/FOB) with clear supplier audit criteria (WRAP/BSCI). |
Sourcing model chosen with basic justification; audit standards mentioned briefly. |
Vague sourcing plan; lacks compliance considerations or supplier selection criteria. |
|
Landed Cost Financial Accuracy |
Landed cost matrix is mathematically accurate with realistic freight, duty, and retail margin calculations. |
Minor mathematical or duty rate errors, but overall costing framework is logical. |
Unrealistic costs; fails to include duties or freight; incorrect markup calculations. |
|
Quality Control & Logistics Plan |
Thorough QC plan with clear AQL 2.5 protocols, Incoterm selection, and inspection checkpoints. |
Basic AQL inspection strategy outlined with standard Incoterm choice. |
Missing QC inspection criteria or incorrect application of Incoterms. |